• Peter Lynn Uniq Quad 4.5M2 Review

    By IanD

    A good flying kite in a very complete, compact package 

    Positives
    Very light
    Super compact
    Great value
    Negatives / Considerations
    Reduced wind window width

    Test Report on the Peter Lynn UNIQ QUAD Single-skin power kite, 4.5m2 version on 2 handles/quad lines
    Just for something different, I tried a single-skin kite, this one an offering from the Peter Lynn stable.

    peter_lynn_uniq_quad_4.5m_001.png

    peter_lynn_uniq_quad_4.5m_002.png

    Photos courtesy of Peter Lynn Kitesports (On account of I was too lazy to photograph my own-same size, same colour)

    TEST LOCATION & CONDITIONS

    • Inland NSW, on a large, open sports complex
    • Temp 27ºC
    • Wind E to NE, 1 to 12kts, mostly around 5-6 kts.
    • Static flying only. No buggy or board


    COMPARISON KITES
    HQ Toxic 5m2
    Zebra Z1 3.5M2

    The kite is promoted by P/L as being compact, lightweight, relatively cheap, stable, easy to fly, crash-damage resistant, very manoeuvrable and very powerful for its size.  It also comes in a 2-line version or a 3-line on a bar
     

    FIRST IMPRESSIONS
    The kite bag is VERY small, particularly for a 4.5m2. (It looks like something you’d use to take a bottle of champagne to a party)

    Everything necessary to rig and fly is supplied and packed into the well-made main bag;

    • The kite itself
    • Quad 18m x 200/100kg Dyneema pre-stretched, colour-coded lines and padded handles
    • A soft drawstring cloth bag for the lines and handles
    • 2 x P/L Kite-Killers (nice bit of kit)
    • A plastic P/L anchor stake in a well-made fabric sheath. (Sand use only. It’s next to useless trying to shove it into grass or dirt. The HQ version is much more versatile)

    (You’ll have fun trying to stuff everything back into this bag after flying, although the kite certainly does wrap up into a very small bundle.)

    All stitching and line attachments are of the usual very high P/L standard. The main (200kg) and brake (100kg) lines look very similar in size, but fortunately are colour-coded and labelled.

     

    LEADING EDGE?
    As this is my first single-skin jobbie, I admit to having a few Senior’s moments trying to find the leading edge due to the absence of those lovely big holes that normally identify the LE.  The kite plan form is a low-aspect design, which keeps the span quite short for the area.
     

    RIGGING
    This is quite conventional using the supplied line number matching and lark’s-head knots.
     

    IN FLIGHT
    As expected, the kite fills easily and lifts almost instantly. Once line tension is steady, the leading edge shape becomes apparent and the kite flies normally.

    Some early observations are;

    • The kite is not particularly fast, compared to most double-skinned foils
    • It is quite agile, allowing for the lower speed
    • The wind window is somewhat smaller/narrower than double-skinned foils
    • The kite won’t overshoot and collapse at the zenith because it doesn’t really get that close to it. Approaching the edges of it’s own wind window, it just slows and either stops or drifts back until it’s back in a sweet spot. Quite neat!
      (Note: I refer to the zenith as a point directly overhead the flyer)
    • This 4.5m2 pulls very hard in gusts (10-12kts) and is happier when it’s kept moving. Pull is at least equal to the HQ Toxic 5.0m2
    • Tight turns are best made with just a light touch on one brake. Main line pulls produce a much slower, wide and smooth turn
    • Backing down to the ground is very easy and controlled using the brakes
    • Reverse launching was easy
    • I tested turbulence behaviour by standing in the lee of a large light tower just upwind of my flying position and this caused the occasional tip tuck which easily un-tucked itself with a tug on the lines
    • Overall, it was not quite as stable as the delightfully mild-mannered Zebra Z1 3.5m2
    • Pumping the lines to keep it up in between soft gusts had markedly less effect than with a double-skin foil
    • The kite showed little or no lift at the zenith, due mostly to the slightly narrower wind window

     

    MEETING PL’s CLAIMS
    Now that I’ve flown the kite, I thought I might match up my experience with the claims P/L have made:

    • Virtually indestructible
      Pretty much correct. You can dive it straight into the ground at any speed and it just crumples up briefly, then is ready for an easy reverse launch
       
    • Incredible wind-range.
      Not sure about this claim. It seemed to behave much the same as any double-skin foil with regard to pull vs. wind speed variations
       
    • Supremely easy to fly.
      Overstated a bit. It is easy to fly, but nothing to get too excited about
       
    • Great performance, more pull per size than any comparable ram airfoil while needing much less wind.
      The kite did pull very hard in very light conditions, although truly objective testing would be needed to see if it really out-pulled an similar sized double-skinned device at the same wind speed
       
    • A lift to drag ratio that is easily equivalent to modern foils, excellent handling and instant power.
      Yes. The kite certainly powered up very quickly in a gust
       
    • No overflying, no collapsing or luffing, ever.
      Not quite, P/L. Any turbulence in very light conditions will induce mild tip folding, but it certainly didn’t want to overfly

     

    FINAL OBSERVATIONS

    • Is it suitable for a beginner?
      Certainly, although there are perhaps better beginner options like the Skydog Power-Foil, Zebra Z1, HQ Beemer, etc..
       
    • Is it suitable as a static fun/workout kite?
      Absolutely! It does fly well, inland or coastal, where it’s lightness and the tiny Pack make it a must-carry anytime. Not too good for jumping
       
    • Is it useful as a buggy engine?
      Yes. So long as you can live with losing some wind window width. It certainly pulls hard at lower angles and has very low lift at the zenith, which is safe. On a buggy trip, it’d be very easy to carry one as a compact, spare larger kite in case the wind drops

     



    IMK, jaysmith, ssayre and 3 others like this


    User Feedback


    Posted

    Nice write up @IanD  there really hasn't been a lot of first hand information on these that I have found.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Posted

    Thanks ssayre. I might do a followup when I get to fly it in some different wind conditions

    Cheers IanD

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Posted

    Thanks for the review @IanD, first real hands-on we've read of the Uniq Quad.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Posted

    I'm glad it was useful Joel. The kite continues to impress with it's power, but I don't think that it will replace my Toxics or Zebra Z1 in terms of reaching high on wind. Extremely portable for its size, though.

    Cheers

    IanD

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Posted

    Only thing that confuses me is it was released after the flysurfer peak, and then they called it uniq? 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Posted

    On 8/26/2016 at 8:07 PM, socommk233 said:

    Only thing that confuses me is it was released after the flysurfer peak, and then they called it uniq? 

    PL (Mr P. Lynn himself) made the kite available to the masses (direct from the Chinese maker) well before it was released as an official PL product.

    So you should find it around the same or earlier release dates.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Posted

     Giving uniq quads a lower angle of attack by altering bridle lenghts and putting rods in the L/E (like the paragliders) make it fly alot better and has low end power like nothing else.  in standard form  flying it standing in paddock it flew well but hook into a buggy and was another story being very stally and wouldnt punch ahead. ive tried a 2.5 with same mods and went very well.

    andy666 likes this

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.


    Sign In Now